3. Critical estimates and judgements

While preparing financial statements, the Group makes certain estimates and assumptions, which have a direct influence on both the financial statements presented and the notes to the financial statements.

The estimates and assumptions that are used by the Group in determining the value of its assets and liabilities as well as revenues and costs, are made based on historical data and other factors which are available and are considered to be proper in the given circumstances.

Assumptions regarding the future and the data available are used for assessing carrying amounts of assets and liabilities which cannot be determined interchangeably using other sources. In making estimates the Group takes into consideration the reasons and sources of the uncertainties that are anticipated at the balance sheet date. Actual results may differ from estimates.

Estimates and assumptions made by the Group are subject to periodic reviews. Adjustments to estimates are recognised in the periods in which the estimates were adjusted, provided that these adjustments affect only the given period. If the adjustments affect both the period in which the adjustment was made as well as future periods, they are recognised in the period in which the adjustments were made and in the future periods.

The most significant areas in which the Group performs critical estimates are presented below:

3.1 Impairment of loans and advances

An impairment loss is incurred when there is objective evidence of impairment due to events that occurred after the initial recognition of the asset (‘a loss event’) and when the loss event has a reliably measurable impact on the expected future cash flows from the financial asset or group of financial assets. Future cash flows are assessed by the Group on the basis of estimates based on historical parameters.

The methodology and assumptions used in the estimates of impairment allowances are reviewed on a regular basis to minimise the differences between the estimated and actual loss amounts.

The impact of an increase/decrease of cash flows for the Group’s loans and advances portfolio assessed for impairment on the basis of individual analysis of future cash flows arising both from own payments and realisation of collaterals, i.e. the exposures for which an individual method is applied and the impact of an increase/decrease of the amount of portfolio parameters for the Group’s loans and advances portfolio assessed on a portfolio and group basis is presented in the table below (in PLN million):

Estimated change in impairment of loans and advances resulting from:31.12.201531.12.2014
+10% scenario-10% scenario+10% scenario-10% scenario
change in the present value of estimated cash flows for the Bank’s loans
and advances portfolio assessed on an individual basis(individually determined to be impaired)
           (204)             364            (260)             405
change in probability of default               60              (60)               84              (84)
change in recovery rates            (435)             435            (478)             479

More on impairment of loans and advances is described in Note 56 Credit Risk Management

3.2 Valuation of derivatives and non-listed debt securities available for sale

The fair value of non-option derivatives is determined using valuation models based on discounted cash flows expected to be received from the given financial instrument. Options are valued using option pricing models. The variables and assumptions used in a valuation include, where available, data derived from observable markets.

The fair value of derivatives includes own credit risk as well as counterparty credit risk. In case of derivative instruments adjustment of the valuation of derivatives reflecting counterparty credit risk CVA (credit value adjustment) and adjustment of the valuation of derivatives reflecting own credit risk DVA (debit value adjustment) is calculated. The process of calculation of the CVA and DVA adjustments includes a selection of method determining the spread of a counterparty’s or the Bank’s credit risk (e.g. a market price method based on the constant price quotations of debt instruments issued by the counterparty, a method of spread implied from Credit Default Swap contracts), an estimation of the probability of default of the counterparty or the Bank and the recovery rate and calculation of the amount of CVA and DVA adjustments. As at 31 December 2015 the amount relating to CVA and DVA amounted to PLN 2 million (As at 31 December 2014 it amounted to PLN 4 million.)

The fair value of non-listed debt securities available for sale is determined using valuation models based on discounted cash flows expected to be received from the given financial instrument. In the valuation of non-listed debt securities available for sale, assumptions are also made about the counterparty's credit risk, which may have an impact on the pricing of the instruments. The credit risk of the securities, for which there is no reliable market price available, is included in the margin, for which the valuation methodology is consistent with the calculation of credit spreads to determine the CVA and DVA adjustments.

The valuation techniques used by the Bank for non-option derivative instruments are based on yield curves based on available market data (deposit rates on interbank market, IRS quotations). The Group conducted a simulation to assess the potential influence of changes of the yield curves on the transaction valuation.

The tables below present the outcomes of estimated changes in valuation of non-option derivative instruments due to parallel movements of yield curves:

a) for the whole portfolio of non-option derivative instruments (in PLN million):

Estimated change in valuation dueto parallel movement of yield curve by: 31.12.2015 31.12.2014
  +50 b.p. scenario -50 b.p. scenario +50 b.p. scenario -50 b.p. scenario
IRS (34) 34 (44) 44
CIRS (95) 99 (99) 104
other derivatives (1) 1 (2) 2
Total (130) 134 (145) 150

b) for instruments under hedge accounting (in PLN million):

Estimated change in valuation dueto parallel movement of yield curve by: 31.12.2015 31.12.2014
  +50 b.p. scenario -50 b.p. scenario +50 b.p. scenario -50 b.p. scenario
IRS (61) 63 (67) 68
CIRS (95) 99 (99) 104
Total (156) 162 (166) 172

3.3 Calculation of provision for employee benefits

The provision for retirement benefits is created on the basis of an actuarial valuation performed periodically by an external independent actuary. Valuation of the employee benefit provisions is performed using actuarial techniques and assumptions.

The calculation of the provision includes retirement and pension benefits expected to be paid in the future. The Group performed a reassessment of its estimates as at 31 December 2015, on the basis of calculation conducted by an independent external actuary. The provisions calculated equate to discounted future payments, taking into account staff turnover, and relate to the period ending on the balance sheet date. An important factor affecting the amount of the provision is the adopted financial discount rate, which was adopted by the Bank at the level of 2.75%, similarly to the last year.

A contribution of an increase/decrease in the financial discount rate and main actuarial assumptions by 1 pp. to a decrease/increase in the amount of the provision for retirement benefits as at 31 December 2015 and as December 2014 is presented in the table below (in PLN million):

Estimated change in provisionas at 31.12.2015 Financial discount rate Planned increase in base salaries
  +1 pp. scenario -1 pp. scenario +1 pp. scenario -1 pp. scenario
Provision for retirement and pension benefits (5) 6 6 (5)

Estimated change in provisionas at 31.12.2014 Financial discount rate Planned increase in base salaries
  +1 pp. scenario -1 pp. scenario +1 pp. scenario -1 pp. scenario
Provision for retirement and pension benefits (4) 5 5 (4)

Gains and losses of the calculations conducted by an actuary are recognised in other comprehensive income.

The Group creates provisions for future liabilities arising from unused annual leave (taking into account all outstanding unused holiday days), from damages and severance payments made to those employees whose employment contracts are terminated for reasons independent of the employee, and for the employee compensation costs incurred in the current period which will be paid out in future periods, including bonuses.

3.4 Useful economic lives of tangible fixed assets, intangible assets and investment properties

In estimating useful economic lives of particular types of tangible fixed assets, intangible assets and investment properties, the following factors are considered:

1) expected physical wear and tear, estimated based on the average period of use recorded to date, reflecting the normal physical wear and tear rate, intensity of use etc.,
2) technical or market obsolescence,
3) legal and other limitations on the use of the asset,
4) expected use of the asset assessed based on the expected production capacity or volume,
5) other factors affecting useful lives of such assets.

When the period of use of a given asset results from a contract term, the useful life of such an asset corresponds to the period defined in the contract. If the estimated useful life is shorter than the period defined in the contract, the estimated useful life is applied.

The impact of change in useful economic lives of assets being subject to depreciation and classified as land and buildings on the change of financial result is presented in the table below (in PLN million):

Change in useful economic lives of assets beingsubject to depreciation and classified as land andbuildings 31.12.2015 31.12.2014
  +10 years scenario -10 years scenario +10 years scenario -10 years scenario
Depreciation costs (38) 233 (47) 237